🔍 Breaking Down the St. Louis Fed's Landmark GenAI Study

The St. Louis Federal Reserve has published what might be the most comprehensive look yet at generative AI's impact on knowledge work.

The headline finding is striking: employees are 33% more productive in hours where they use generative AI. But the full picture painted by researchers Bick, Blandin, and Deming is more nuanced and perhaps more interesting.

📈 The Numbers That Matter

Adoption Rate

• 21.8% of workers now use generative AI at least weekly

• AI assists between 6-25% of work hours for active users

Productivity Gains

• 33% increase in productivity during AI-assisted hours

• ⏰ One-third of daily users save 4+ hours weekly

• Only 11.5% of occasional users see similar time savings

Big Picture Impact

• 1.1% increase in aggregate productivity (Aug-Nov 2024)

• Most organizations still in pilot phase

🎯 The Integration Question

What makes this study particularly valuable is how it frames AI adoption. Rather than treating AI as a simple productivity tool, the researchers examine how it's becoming integrated into knowledge workers' daily routines. They found AI is being used across a spectrum of tasks, from routine email drafting to complex data analysis.

💡 Key Insight: Skill Acceleration

The qualitative findings add important context: workers report that AI interaction accelerates skill acquisition, particularly in technical domains. The study notes that moderately skilled coders are "instantly expanding their aptitude" when leveraging AI-generated suggestions. This points to AI's potential not just as a productivity enhancer, but as a capability multiplier.

🔮 Looking Forward

The researchers emphasize the importance of thoughtful implementation. Their findings suggest that while early productivity gains are promising, long-term impact will depend on how effectively organizations integrate AI into their core functions. This includes:

• Developing clear guidelines around AI usage

• Managing sensitive data appropriately

• Creating robust decision-making processes

🤔 Strategic Questions to Consider

  1. How do we balance quick productivity gains against the need for strategic integration?
  2. What separates organizations seeing significant gains from those seeing minimal impact?
  3. How should training and oversight evolve as AI becomes more central to daily work?

💬 Your Turn: Are these numbers matching what you're seeing in your organization? Reply with your thoughts - I'm particularly interested in hearing about real-world implementation challenges and successes.

Join the AI-Driven HR Revolution

To stay at the forefront of AI applications in HR, consider subscribing to our full catalogue of prompts here at GPT for HR.

You'll be joining forward-thinking HR professionals from progressive organizations (like the below) who are already leveraging these tools to transform their practices...

As a reminder, you can see some of the difference between free prompts and subscriber prompts here...

What are the prompts I get access to as a subscriber?
Across GPT for HR you’ll see both free prompts for anyone to use and reference, and then subscriber-only paid prompts, which are much more in depth. The cost of subscribing is very reasonable and most subscribers are expensing the cost. Here are two examples, below is a free prompt used
GPT for HRSam